We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.
The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ...
Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.
Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.
Professor James Faulconbridge, a dedicated member of the TiPS team and Professor of Transnational Management at Lancaster University Management School, has written a brand-new paper, which will feature in the International Journal of Legal Profession.
This paper explores the impacts of machine learning (ML), as one form of artificial intelligence, on legal work by examining three questions.
First, it considers trajectories and how ML is being used in legal work. Existing use cases are examined to reveal how ML is changing legal work. Second, it considers questions about the barriers that are standing in the way of different trajectories, with the more rapid adoption of tried and tested forms of ML and some of the more radical changes that have been predicted being contingent on a range of factors. Third, this paper considers how evolution might change spaces of legal work and the legal profession.
It examines both what ML might do to reconfigure the role of the lawyer within law firms and other spaces and how lawyers might respond to this as the professional project adapts to the challenge of artificial intelligence. Through the analysis, the paper develops the concept of mediated evolution, which is a way of conceptualising change in legal work that is material and meaningful but which is also path-dependent and non-linear and thus needs to be understood through a situated analysis of the enactment in practice of change.